A Pentagon official who criticized large U.S. law firms for representing terrorism suspects at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has apologized for his comments, saying that his discussion on a local radio program does not reflect his "core beliefs"....
"Regrettably, my comments left the impression that I question the integrity of those engaged in the zealous defense of detainees in Guantanamo," Stimson wrote. "I do not."
huh?
his core beliefs?
he doesn't "question the integrity of those engaged...?"
i repeat the money quote from the previous troglodyte post:
I think, quite honestly, when corporate C.E.O.’s see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001, those C.E.O.’s are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms, and I think that is going to have major play in the next few weeks. And we want to watch that play out.
what are his core beliefs? that the Constitution does not guarantee basic representation in legal matters? that not everyone has the right of haebeus corpus? that politics trumps all else?
who has the real integrity? not Stimson. he's a lout who has been given the task of dealing with legal matters for the federal government. a government whose main task is protecting the people.
mr. stimson - apology not accepted.
he still needs to be fired and as far as mr. bush
Impeach the bastard!
No comments:
Post a Comment